AWS Elastic Beanstalk VS Google App Engine
If you are looking for a Platform as a Service (PaaS) provider, AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine are two of the most popular options available. Both are used by developers to build and host applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
But which one is better suited for your needs? In this post, we will provide an unbiased comparison between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine, based on various features and aspects.
Deployment and Scaling
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is known for its ease of deployment with support for multiple languages and frameworks. AWS Elastic Beanstalk also offers Auto Scaling and Load Balancing features to accommodate any changes in demand.
On the other hand, Google App Engine's deployment process is simple and fast as developers only have to upload the code, and Google takes care of the rest. The platform also offers automatic scaling based on application needs.
Flare Compare Team’s joke time
Deploying with AWS Elastic Beanstalk is so easy, even your grandma can do it. With Google App Engine, it's so fast that your application is already live before you can say "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious."
When comparing the scaling capabilities, Google App Engine might have a slight edge over AWS Elastic Beanstalk since it has no hard limits on the number of instances.
Cost
Cost is an important factor to consider while choosing a PaaS provider.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk has a free tier which includes 750 hours of Amazon EC2 usage per month, but you will have to pay for any additional resources or services. In contrast, Google App Engine's free tier includes 28 instance hours, 5GB Cloud Storage, and 1GB of Datastore Storage per day.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a more extensive array of instance types to choose from, which can be beneficial if you have specific requirements. However, this also means that the pricing is more complex than Google’s uniform instance type and pricing model.
Flare Compare Team’s joke time
We understand that choosing a PaaS provider can be a tough decision. But don't worry, AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine won't cost you an arm and a leg. After all, we still need them, so we can afford to keep our limbs.
Integration and Compatibility
AWS Elastic Beanstalk integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, and developers can use their preferred tools and environments. With Elastic Beanstalk, you can build applications using Java, .NET, Node, Python, Ruby, Go, and Docker.
Google App Engine also supports various programming languages, including Java, Python, Node.js, Ruby, Go, and PHP. However, it might not be as compatible with third-party tools and extensions as AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
Database
While AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports various databases, including MySQL, Oracle, and PostgreSQL, there is an overhead in setting up databases. Once set, however, these databases would function well.
Google App Engine, on the other hand, comes with built-in support for Google Cloud SQL, a fully managed and scalable SQL database service.
Reliability and Support
Both AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine guarantee high reliability, with service availability of up to 99.95%. In case of any issues, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers 24/7 support, while Google App Engine only offers email support for free tier users.
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is known for its excellent documentation and user-friendly interface, making it easy to use for new developers. Google App Engine, on the other hand, caters to large scale applications with extensive infrastructure needs.
Conclusion
To conclude, both AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Google App Engine have their strengths and weaknesses. AWS Elastic Beanstalk might be a better option if you are already using other AWS services and need a wide range of instance types. Google App Engine is the way to go if you want instant and hassle-free deployments and a scalable database.